Talk:Arash/@comment-31180761-20190619145540/@comment-31180761-20190621044928

My god does nobody actually read comments over here. I don't know how many times I have to state this: I never said Arash didn't deal extra damage based on his OC effect. I said that if the "Extra damage" modifier was multiplicative like all the others and followed the same damage calculation rules (the ones I copied again and again) then Arash would be dealing no damage (as a whole not just OC effect) at OC1. That statement was a hypothetical, not what I was saying was actually true. No shit the claim was my own, if it wasn't somebody would have already changed this page; I've only just brought the issue up.

It's clear as day that Arash's "Extra damage" modifier is 0% at OC1 right? It's also clear as day that William Tell's "Extra damage" modifier is 200% at OC1 right? So riddle me this: why does William Tell deal double damage but Arash doesn't do 0? If it's multiplicative, then William deals double damage and Arash deals 0 (a * b; base NP modifier * "Extra damage" modifier). If it's Additive, then William doesn't deal double damage and Arash deals base damage (a + b; base NP modifier + "Extra damage" modifier). If there are different rules, than change the wording. If the problem was that Arash only did base damage at OC 1 but his "extra "multiplier was still multiplicative then change his OC1 multiplier to 100%. It's that simple. I don't know how this is so hard to wrap your minds around.

@Paul I was almost tempted to believe you, but then I thought Arash doing nearly 200k damage at NP5 OC5 to neutral mobs with no buffs and no fou at lvl60 was a bit BS. Turns out, it is. Unless you have a video to prove your point and make me question the entirety of the FGO servers, it seems that his "Extra damage" modifier is in fact additive. 1200%+800% not 1200%*800%.