Talk:Okita Sōji/@comment-29027964-20180524023826/@comment-27971189-20180608150827

To conclude this.

First, look at yourself, you admitting she's lacking, compare to Lancelot. Why she deserves better from what she currently at when Lancelot is better than her? The reasons why Artoria located far below is because other Sabers have no issue outclass her, providing better result.

What happened to Okita is simply the same. And I already said my test using her.

Did you think I can wrote:

"Why do I need to pick her Quick card only for stars available for limited turn when I can have straight three turns, consistent stars that everyone could use, minimalize risk of card shuffle during difficult battle while also has potential of better outcome with some star management which also included on Lancelot kit?"

Is without ever tried running her and Lancelot extensively?

What I'm talking here is not EXP Hands or QP Doors, but those like Mammoth Ivan and Kiara, who not give a damn other than throwing critical damage to everyone.

Second, well ...

If you think good NP gain, dodge and defense down is strong point--

That's easily ignorant to how nowadays Servants did not have qualm to offers more with more certain results even if that means having low NP gain at cost.

That Nero Bride you keep saying sacrificing firepowers can throw that defense down that you really proud about with burn from her NP firmly; adapting to situation better than Okita, offers more than Okita, easily strong Arts Saber pick if one looking forward to better Arts flow.

From the very first, not only you admit Lancelot usually better than her, you can't even covering "What is latest difficult content?"; "How her performance compare to newer units when deal with it?"; "How far his/her presence help, affecting the whole situation?" "Is the difficulty to pull the kit worth it?"

No need to continue this discussion if what you can say is only good NP gain.