Talk:Miyu Edelfelt/@comment-37188655-20190506022138/@comment-28209103-20190630194539

@Valeth : dafuq you're talking about again. you are asking for counter argument but now you're dodging the question  when I raised one, sure it's all DW fault or intern kun fault or whatever.

Stop building a strawman, I literally asked how the fuck you cams to NP 2+ bullshit literally by showing your own logic don't hold up. I don't give a fuck bout DW this is all about your and your argument only.

And yes Meta design is shifting which is why I said firepower requirement is arguable and worthy of another discussion of it's own.

However don't gloss over bout the servant design that you just tried to BS through. What happened to "how many "flaws" are designed" BS? Now I ask you then HOW MANY FLAWS ARE BY DESIGN? To be even more specific how many servant are by design flawed to get you to Np+ them?

What you said about intentional flaw doesn't make any sense. Did they release Astolfo, Summer Mordred, MHXA, Osakabe, or MHX so bad on purpose? If yes then for what reason? Yet it's clear that their kit are so bad on release they're practically a butt joke not worth the NP5.

If they're going to patch MHXA 3 months post release why not make her like that from beginning? The sad reality is DW are not perfect and making a game is not a pet project. Once X is decided by team you need to implement it regardless of your opinion and any change must be made with team consent.

But again speculation. I can also argue that Miyu is a market probing for example to see how player react to well known character with uttey garbage kit unheard before, it might be because they actually think Miyu is good idea on paper, it might be because they asked Hiroyama for design and get this in return. AGAIN SPECULATION.

Speculation against speculation = double the bullshit since nothings can came out of it hence spare me that shit. Hence what I ask is simply what is your basis for those intentional flaws bullshit because outside of Miyu it doesn't apply to anything.

I don't care if you use cheap sarcasm or whatever but you literally asked for counter argument and a counter argument you get. Then you wanna gloss it over? Suuure.

And I said this is pointless specifically since I'm talking with Velox. Not the whole discussion.