Talk:Okita Sōji/@comment-29027964-20180524023826/@comment-33190109-20180526110651

First of all, one correction - you don't choose Okita's Quick card only for stars, but also to fill her gauge. Her Quick card is like an Arts card, in some way, that can generate a good sum of stars.

Okita needs her Quick card to appear to provide stars, but if you add a source of passive star geneartion (like 2030 or Hans) into the team, even just one of her Quicks - put last in the chain - can add enough stars to accumulate a good amount.

Her high NP gain is not tied to her critical hits - her NP spam is tied to her critical hits.

Having high NP gain and high NP damage is pretty much a big deal, even by Appmedia standards - otherwise servants like Archuria, Jack and Rider Kintoki wouldn't be ranked high in their lists. And it's not all Okita has - she also provides stars (and simultaneously fills her gauge) and deals critical damage.

Even if MHX has a good invulnerability with a cooldown of 5 turns, she still lacks in so many areas, and I don't think it is enough to rank her above Okita.

While Okita is probably not as strong as the three NP spammers I mentioned, and I agree that Saber Lancelot usually outperforms her - I still think that she is underrated. Do you really believe that Iskandar, who is ranked above Okita by Appmedia, is going to outperform her in challenging content? Don't get me wrong - I agree that she is too weak as a unit to be considered a part of the meta - and that is why I think she needs a buff.