Talk:Mysterious Heroine X (Alter)/@comment-30522333-20170222023750/@comment-27971189-20170222200108

In my case, I'm doing most of it on Trial Quest. So MHXA with No CE as I believe it'll be the fairest way to judge her given how recently there are a lot of bias raised since Merlin arrival.

Testing her with casual team (Karna, Waver) and crits-oriented team (Lancelot Saber, Hans, Waver, 2030). In casual team, Sovereign fail to amuse me, I learned that her damage is very low.

When I tested her on crits-oriented team, I'd say that's exactly the moment where her strength and weakness is truly visible; not only because the team tried to do the most obvious setup to lift a Quick servant, but also because during that time MHXA received more attacks than Lancelot and Hans.

Turned out Sovereign is no match for RNG; first skill favor heal per turn so you can prevent worst case scenario, if she crits its good-- if no that's bad news, as she is underwhelming without stars.

By that time if its not because heal from Hans NP that raise her HP at right moment (her 1st Skill activated) she's done as she survive with 60 HP, after Babbage crits-- then battle ended with her doing Q-B-Q crits to Babbage. Surely a development you can say "Its not working against enemies that crits like madman" but that pretty much told you how 1st skill act as surviving method.

I never take screenshot or doing video for something like this, aside reason memory space is too precious, its almost impossible expecting exactly same scenario happened; for myself, its not photo that important, but the overall decision from both sides which is the real value of doing run for test instead of simply, "Hey guys, I got this amount of stars with this setup!".

My test of MHXA on Babbage ones is the only I consider as most successful as succesful crits, attack target, heal timing done by both sides like exactly right to do proper test.

At the end, its up to you to believe. If you not believe it, by 50/50 portion, I'm okay with it.