Thread:Valeth/@comment-4802891-20180703161311/@comment-30314236-20180712002919

I put them in comparison because of the primary effect of the skill, without considering other factors such as the Servants role and performance in certain type of battles. Looking only at the skill and comparing it to other similars, I find it a bit lacking (yeah, the side effects are too different, that's why I said that I shouldn't compare them). If you look at the Servant in general, Abigail has more to offer than those two.

It still annoys me when looking at Angra's skill, though, which is the same but better (again, only talking about the skill, not the Servant overall and team composition). I pretty much lack support units that can make my team viable in certain situations, maybe that's why I'm looking at the issue with that PoV.

Also, I don't think Izo's Manslayer should last for three turns. It is 100% damage, while Human Comprehension is 50%. Manslayer also has crit up, while HC has defense boost against humanoid (which includes Servants). Looking at them taking into account their role in battle, I find it fair, and you could say that the same goes for Abby, and it wouldn't be wrong, but it still cringes me when I know there's the same skill but with better CD and attack down.

As side note, when you mentioned Nightingale and Izo, I think about how the game has developed in terms of meta and mechanics, and how some of the old Servants may require more than just a skill or NP upgrade to keep them relevant.