Talk:Chloe von Einzbern/@comment-34208015-20180211101651/@comment-34208015-20180318114530

Well that an old topic and i didn't come to this page for quite a long time. But just to answer a few of your interrogation.

First when I say that ST servant over AOE servant it's a biais that I introduce for myself after considering everything else it's my personal liking but I didn't take it in consideration while I delivered my review that is 100% objective. I never said Emiya is bad because he has an AOE. Anyway the main problem I have with Emiya isn't the fact that his NP is AOE but that he is Buster with a Art deck and a Crit generation and Crit damage oriented skill. No matter how I love Emiya as a Fate character gameplay his distorded with 3 Art cards with a skill that increase his star gen rate. The only way to benefit for it is to use on NP but yet his NP Buster so it won't generate much stars either. And once have generate let's say 20 stars from NP and you want to use it with his awesome 100% crit damage up buff you're unlucky most the time with your card draw (stuck with a 1 Quick and 2 Art) even if you manage to luckily pull his unique Buster card with a good crit rate with can perform a brave chain with both Buster card as 1st card and buster as last card.

I'm not saying he's totally useless his Buster crit if landed correctly hit like a truck and if you put it in an Art team you'll get Art chain quite often. But compared to Kuro that has similar NP gain, a skill for instant NP charge and a much more powerful NP because since she's a welfare she has easy NP5. For me Kuro is an extremely good general purpose Archer (on a SSR level of performance) while Emiya is much harder to get working while not being necessarly stronger even in optimal conditions.