Talk:Jack the Ripper/@comment-220.244.130.150-20151218020508/@comment-220.244.130.150-20151219030820

Another way to look at it. Do you guys think that if Jack the Ripper wasn't genderbent, she'd be a 5-star? I don't think so, because obviously DW has to pander to the otakus that are into lolis. Due to high demand, they make her a 5-star which DOESN'T MAKE SENSE AT ALL. Because in-universe, as already pointed out, she'd be easily beaten by other characters. So why isn't she a 2-star like Phantom? They are both share that mysterious vibe. If not 2 star why not 3-star like Gilles another serial killer? The fact that because she is a loli made to pander to sick otaku interests by making her in league to the likes of Gilgamesh, King Arthur, etc. so that people would throw money at the gacha is RIDICULOUS. Not only that but there are heroes who aren't even gold yet if you think about it, they are already stronger than Jack.

To the guy above this comment, of course it's Fate it doesn't make sense IN THE REAL WORLD. BUT it does have explanations on how things work, which make it plausible in a FICTIONAL setting. Hence the infodumping, the extra materials and interviews. Genderbending is already a given, because it is more marketable. The difference between Artoria and Jack? Artoria's abilities make her strong enough to be considered 5 stars in addition to the legend in which she was based on. So your comment doesn't add to this discussion at all.