Talk:Chloe von Einzbern/@comment-35280522-20180628033423/@comment-28209103-20180628035156

virtually the same, I have Chloe at 10/10/10 level 90 and NP2 Chiron at 6/10/10 level 80 and this is what I know so far

Let's highlight the similarities : Virtually similar active NP gain, Chiron have passive star generator while Chloe 3rd skill make her a pseudo assassin, both are capable of bypass defense to some degree via NP. both are self sufficient.

While both are NP spammer Chloe have better damage return being NP5 NP spammer and more proficient at it because of her 3rd skill. However she's selfish through and through so her role is to be fully supported for maximum return. Usually I'm using a Support-Support-Chloe formation with her most often Waver-Tamamo-Chloe and you can go NP spamming and skill spamming almost every turn no worry.

Chiron more support oriented, unless you whale or lucky probably you only have him at NP 1 or 2, and added with his lower buff his damage are noticeably weaker than Chloe per NP.. on top of that Chloe can spam her NP faster than Chiron so on this side Chloe is the absolute winner.

However Chiron is noticeably better than Chloe on Arts critical team.. on top of that his team build are way more flexible than Chloe. e.g using Chiron in full Archer team is better than Chloe on full archer team. Other than that like I said critical Arts team with Chiron is noticeably really strong. So far the one I tested is Hans-Chiron-MHXA, then Hans-Chiron-Gil bride, then Chiron-Waver-Isthar, and such and such.

If you could afford to build an Arts spam team then Chloe is way better,, you'll get NP level of damage and constant crit with her on top of continous healing and debuff-stall. However Waver-Tamamo is expensive combo and no one can replace Tamamo role.

Arts crit team are noticebly cheaper and have more formation, you can subt star generator with 2030 or you can use normal star generator like Hans, Lancelot, Casgil or Jeanne. Either way how good or bad it is depends on your tune up..