Talk:EMIYA/@comment-120.188.35.88-20180228135059/@comment-34208015-20180505095219

@Acerbus Vultus:

"the problem is because you didnt use him often enough to realized just how good and effective he is"

Nah, the problem isn't that I didn't used Emiya enough or that you used it long enough to grab his strengh -_-. FGO is a simple game with simple mecanisms, it doesn't require "skill" in the sense insane reflex or visual acuity, fight are not even time limited and further more the wikia is so well documented that you can grabs almost every bit of the unit by simply reading his page, you just need some analytic mindset. That's said since I have my own Emiya, I didn't just read his description, I also did some test on field using him bare with some random trash comp to farm dailies just to grab how he perform in team individually. And it didn't took me long to grabs both his strenghs and weaknesses.

"you saying him not optimal means that he's not good enough"

I can't believe after all these times that I said I'm not commenting on if Emiya is good or bad people still think that I'm bad mouthing >_>. Well I guess it's my bad because something similar happened on Musashi page where Valeth accused to say that Musashi was bad while I wasn't...

Once again optimality has nothing to do with how good or bad is a servant. Here I'm saying that Emiya isn't optimal in the sense that his deck isn't the best match for his skillset. Inversely if Emiya had trash skill level but the best deck to deck to exploit it I would have said that he is optimal regarding this criteria but does it mean that he would have been better? No. Again when I say that Emiya isn't optimal I don't mean that he's not good.

Now if you think that a skill that help star gen and crit damage is the best match for a QAAAB deck on a servant with low base star gen then I have no more argument to convince you.