Talk:Helena Blavatsky/@comment-42.113.160.114-20160406175706/@comment-27107874-20160407092111

That's a pretty abstract interpretation. And not that I actually care, but afaik Gil was the king of Mesopotamia. Claiming he's Iraqi is like saying Nero Claudius is Italian. If you're only looking at what's become of that region it might be somewhat of a correct assumption. But back then it wasn't. Don't really know about the arab thing, but that's pretty generic. Might as well say "he was once a human". You're not wrong. But you're not acurate as well^^