Talk:Asagami Fujino/@comment-33844581-20180228214835/@comment-28209103-20180314034520

Vacuum comparison is always incomplete, it might be useful for beginner but it'll left a lot of thing uncovered giving you an incomplete picture. This is especially important for beginner to so that they could plan what to level to complement what they have so that they actually have a strong team in the future. Which is why I said go for Fujino, quick team is garbage so stick to Buster or Arts main for now.

In the first place the two almost have nothing in common except being ST Archer, Fujino belong to the straightforward enemy killing role, according to role her direct comparison in archer class of same rarity is Lezbo pirate, Chloe, and Bob. Altera belong to hybrid support hitter role like Tristan, Tomoe, Nobu, and Atalante. Since OP asked for direct comparison I can only highlight that the team around those two are completely different which is why I compare Buster and Quick instead. I guess I should've highlight that they had almost nothing in common from beginning

The objectively bad servant in this game can be counted in one hand or even two finger, there's no potentially good or good, it's just whether you can or cannot use them at full potential. If there's such thing as "potentially good" then a lot of the top servant actually belong to that category, while the mediocre one mostly belong to the 'good' type, this is because there's this thing called specialized vs general use in this game, and 'good' usually fall to the general type, being good no matter what your team is means their function are constant no matter what the team is if we put it on good term, putting it on bad term however it means they don't carry much value when included in team. Ofc this does not include the cookie cutter type which is Waver and to some extent Hans.

IMO there's nothing wrong by evaluating servant in vacuum but that's pretty much just the very first step. For the next step you need to separate it according to type, and role.. then compare it by class rarity and/or role and this is just the 2nd step but at this point this is enough to gain 80% accurate information bout the servant.. the rest 20% are servant by servant and case by case basis.

At the very least comparing something according to personal preferences is highly unrelieable. for someone to know if X is good or bad, he must first have something that are valid to be compared, otherwise it's just BS. In this case it is not valid to compare Fujino and Altera directly so I have to take it higher into team comp. Your comparison in vacuum are highly subjective, I could similarly said that I value Altera versatility in various team and said she's better but that's hardly a valid evaluation IMO.