Talk:Artoria Pendragon/@comment-36544918-20190226193445/@comment-36544918-20190312160005

Still, i feel it's wrong, maybe even a bit bias, to say that Artoria is "the etymologically correct translation", since no matter if it's the most agreed etymology, we still do not know if that's actually where Arthur came from.

I feel like it'd be better to say that "While the origin of the name Arthur is unknown, a popular etymology is Artorius, by that etymology, Artoria is a more correct translation of her name." Rather than, "The name "Artoria" is a femenization of the name "Artorius", the roman name that "Arthur" originated from, and is the etymologically correct translation of her name." because it pretty much says something no philologist would say (since most would agree to leave the etymology as "unknown" or "maybe, but we are not 100% sure") and acts pretty bias against Altria, which is the romonization/translation, type moon, and i'm guessing, Nasu wanted.

I get that Altria sounds weird and that this wiki takes fan translations over official ones, but acting like Artoria is correct, when, really, we have no way of knowing if it actually is, is bias.