Talk:EMIYA/@comment-120.188.35.88-20180228135059/@comment-34208015-20180503185752

Well, once again I'm not arguing about if Emiya is good or bad. It's not my point. I'm saying that he suboptimal because his deck and skillset doesn't match.

"his star gen is bad? well what do you think his 2nd skill is for? its literally the reason he's a beast! 100% crit gen and damage for 3 turn and you still think he's suboptimal just because he have 3 arts card?"

Yeah I still think Emiya is suboptimal, you can have +200% star gen or even more what the point if all you can pull out from your deck is are Art cards that can't generate stars? I didn't played much Emiya but it didn't take me long to realized that he has only 2 ways to generate some stars: his NP and his Extra move. It's quite unpratical hence he's not a good star engine no matter how much boost he'll get for generating stars. Next +100% crit damage? Sure it's great to deal damage as far as goes for dealing damage with crit, Buster card are way better at this Art (especially when equally boosted) in consequences Emiya with his triple A deck is suboptimal exploit Hawkeye potential, on Okita this skill would have been much more montruous. As I said on a previous post Emiya skill set is great but his triple A deck drag him down.

" i did try to explain to you why he's a jack of all trade on my previous comment"

Well I don't see where you explain it, because you see saying that "everything he did, he did pretty good" or "he's a jack of all trade, but master of none and even then, he still did pretty well especially on dealing good amounts of damage" doesn't really tell me at what he's good beside ditching out some damage. I already explained that he's not a good main star engine (you can just use it on his NP turn for such that) so I'm waiting you to tell me his other possible roles beside damage dealer in a team.