Talk:Halloween 2017 Event Revival (US)/@comment-36948134-20181006192945/@comment-24978536-20181007042312

Both Helena and Elizabeth Caster specialize the most in farming (though Elizabeth is a bit more mixed), so this is an fairly easy comparison to make. First off, what does Helena provide for a farming team?:


 * NP Charge, charging the party's NP to full with some Kaleidoscope's and MLB Imaginary Number equipped


 * A fairly powerful AoE NP, especially after her Interlude, that will clear out early enemy waves even with neutral damage (for me, at NP2 without the interlude and lvl 85, 25k HP neutral enemies are not a problem even if the second skill's effect doesn't trigger)


 * Some decent buffs, a few stars that can be useful depending on the team composition (her quick card is really good too)


 * All the above combined into shortening a battle that would take 4-5 turns to only 3 turns. This is really good for quick farming, and in the end, farming is what most players will spend the majority of their gameplay time on.

What Elizabeth Caster provides for the team:


 * A lot more stars, potentially quite useful depending on the team composition


 * A more powerful and reliable NP (though at NP2 post-interlude, I believe Helena's NP will be quite a bit more powerful if her 2nd skill effect triggers)


 * Some survivability for herself, not really viable in farming, but some potential in a boss battle

Both have their pros and while in some teams and potentially in boss battles, Elizabeth Caster may be more useful, I definitely feel Helena's pros are a lot more powerful generally, possibly even in boss battles since her pros are more unique than Elizabeth Caster's (not everyone has a Waver, while everyone does have access to a 3-star and 2-star servants with similar pros as Elizabeth Caster's).