Talk:Atlantis Lostbelt Release/@comment-39618504-20190901181640/@comment-27971189-20191008172856

Let's say we go with "Sefar arrived in 12,000 BC instead of 11,970 BC".

Then following that you need, "Coincidentally holy sword wielder arrived on 12,000 BC as well" following established lore that Sefar defeated by holy wielder. Nice way to wrap it up?

Then it comes other issue, if "Sefar come earlier, defeated and Greek pantheon became prosper due to that", why other pantheons not getting each variation of said timeline where they rule over  Sefar? You can solve it with something like, "Thanks to Jason, somehow Sefar is defeatable without holy sword, praise Greek pantheon", but is it really fine like that?

I won't really call it proper explanation as its too much convenience compare to how LB II and IV costs several gods as deviation happened and not touching "Sefar and holy sword wielder" even once; being LB before Camelot LB doesn't make it right.

From narrative standpoint, it is wiser if Zeus is the 'deviation point' itself... Or maybe, someone behind Zeus armor.