Talk:Helena Blavatsky/@comment-27.78.196.36-20170324154738/@comment-27971189-20170404034925

You fail to see the point.

Ozy can only provide Charisma and NP Charge for a party; there is RNG manipulation, but works only for Servant with RNG-based NP and skills, and the only proper target for such effect so far is Hans who can gain lot of benefit.

Compare to Helena skill set, its way inferior. Helena can provide stars per turn and increase card performance which is way more valuable than a Charisma on long run. Helena herself have a high hit counts that is rare enough for a Caster and come with NP that provide important debuff to all enemies.

Your point of Ozy outclass her is not even stand right at this point. Ozy only outclass her as DPS for obvious reason, for support, at 10/10/10, Helena outclass him without doubt.

In case you forgot, Helena deck is AAAQB with A NP. Ozy deck is AAQBB with B NP.

Even without low cooldown, Helena can provide easier Arts Chain which can substitute Magical Tuning with ease. Ozy? He can't. You can be proud that Protection of Ra have faster cooldown, but only that and Charisma are the only thing he could gave for a party while Helena can provide way better support that in return increasing her output as well.

I also own Helena and I never troubled with Magical Tuning cooldown because I can pull Arts Chain easier with her while Pursuit of Unknown allow party to filling NP bar to certain extent through all cards. I'm really confused how could you troubled with a single NP charge while she also allow easier party's NP charge.

Did Sanzo and Medea did same thing as her? Nope. My point stand still.

Bring Merlin only made my point stands more.

Look at Jeanne, she can easily abuse Invincibility through her NP while Merlin need 8-turn cooldown for Invincibility. Based on your 'fairness' standard, doesn't Merlin should have 5-turn cooldown Invincibility?