Talk:EMIYA/@comment-120.188.35.88-20180228135059/@comment-34208015-20180506131057

@Acerbus Vultus: As I said, my purpose was just to answer why would one want to change Emiya's deck, and my answer is for optimization. The following text wall was pretty much just you arguing that Emiya is a good servant while I'm saying that it's not my point. So indeed it was a somehow a dialogue between dwarf people. It's not even a question about agreeing or not because you basically agree with me when you say that "he may doesnt have the best setup but his kit still works perfectly".

@FGOHikaru:You didn't understand either my point, it's not a question about looking at the bright side or the downside, optimization problem aren't that subjective, it's a totally objective and mathematical problem. What I say is that Emiya will be able to exploit better his skillset with a QQABB deck of course I'm aware that in exchange he'll lose his ability to perform Art brave chains and considerably downing his NP generation that's the downside of this setup if I considering his rather bad quick cards and naturally low NP gain rate. It's not like I want to make Emiya a star generator like Okita or Jack in first place I don't even consider him as a reliable star engine and I totally agree that it's way more smarter to use Hans or Mozart to get the crit stars with the timing you want. But Emiya does have a skill that increase both star gen and crit damage over a fully Art oriented deck this mean there is some waste in his kit and so by the definition of optimality he's not optimal.

Again it's not a review of how good or bad is Emiya: it's not the point. I'm not either arguing on if Emiya should/have to change his deck (thing that anyway will never happen). I'm merely giving a reason to make this change, to show that this purely thoerical change is justified and logic.