Talk:King Hassan/@comment-28754876-20170116061009/@comment-10691202-20170116123004

Nah, not everyone has to like certain aesthetic of servants. I do like his overall look and style but if people cant stand the look as not fitting of assassin, can totally get their point and just agree to disagree with that.

As for the overall usage, one simple way is to take him out like a berserker that is meant to just kill Riders in particular. I personally like BBB on any servants especially if NP is also Buster and has other damage buffs overall. They are like Berserker for specific class enemies that hits hard yet take only 1/2 damage.

I also still enjoy plays from crit based servants like Jack alot (in Babylonia, I took my Jack out like 90% of the time, even when enemy is not riders). Arts-focused servants team compo are fun when u want to spam NPs like nobody business.

General idea of class purpose in gameplay for assassin is for crits play but even in other classes, there are often exceptions to the rule, which imo, make things more fluid. Archers in particular has quite a variety of different archers with unique focus. Sabers, on the other hand, are generally similar, especially for AoE gold sabers, with few exceptions.

Overall, imo, just enjoy the servants playstyle as it is and try to find a mix or team composition that suit them well. As I think Desuyaru mentioned before, there is no bad servants, only bad masters. To add on, I would say compatibilty between master and servant is also important to note (as in gameplay-wise), else even if you can make use the servant well, you wont enjoy using that servant in battle.

Cheers~