Talk:Vlad III (EXTRA)/@comment-5739199-20170101014817/@comment-28209103-20170109143413

Did I came across as snarky? Well i apologize, I tend to speak bluntly, I do aware my blunt way of speaking is rarely well accepted.

The only description of innocent monster eh? the only sources i could think of is TM Wikia and they listed it

"is an attribute possessed by Servants whose history and existence have been distorted by the monstrous reputations they accrued across the course of their life and thereafter. As a consequence, the Servant's abilities and appearance have been rendered to conform to the specifications of their legend"

The very reason I said whatever is that I don't have real basis to confirm nor deny your claim, to put it simply I do know Vlad earned his protection of faith because his extreme method of protecting his faith, but i don't have concrete basis to deny that he earned his skill due to innocent monster, my rationale to not accept because mainly 3 reason, 1. Vlad already have overwhelming faith during his life therefore he originally having this skill is more probable than being given this skill, 2. What I do know about other innocent monster skill bearer, none of them have their personality distorted, even Apo Vlad hate his dracula origin, Phantom already a mad yandere to begin with, Liz... is just Liz, etc. None of them gained personality attributed to their legend and Vlad is unlikely to be an exception, 3. It's my personal opinion but Higashide simply write whatever with his Vlad without too thinking bout their relation too much, hence the confusion, later he just write whatever bout why the two is different.

See? probable, unlikely, personal opinion, none of this argument is really conclusive, it's not entirely baseless yet there can be no conclusion. Therefore i said suit yourself, and since people rarely read between the line I'll just drop this to be sure, yes I do see a way for Vlad to gain such skill from rumor, albeit it's forced weak reasoning. Yes, I considered this, yes I considered that, and as I said, either are baseless clai with weak reasoning, hence one again I said suit yourself.