Talk:Astolfo/@comment-28446509-20180615062411/@comment-35452437-20180827131033

Monstrous strength difference between Medusa and Astolfo is definitely not negligible. She gets 30% attack up for 2 turns rather than Astolfo's 1, that is a huge difference. And Medusa stun isn't just better than Astolfo, its so far above that Astolfo dreams he could reach it lmao. 100% compared to Astolfo's 90% and on an extremely short 8-6 turn CD compared to Astolfo's long as hell 10-8 turn CD. Blood Fort Andromeda is on the same level as Astolfo's EoS because you're hedging your bets on RNG for everything other than NP charge and its on a very long 10-8 turn CD compared to Medusa's 8-6 turn CD. Also Medusa can NP spam similar amounts as Astolfo if not more because of the NP gen rate up from Blood Fort as well as having 2 art cards. Yes Astolfo's NP is better, but he's a 4* so most people will have him at NP1 or NP2 whereas Medusa is always gonna be at NP5 due to being a 3* therefore she'll do more damage on her NP (this is factoring in the NP buff she got in JP). "Who's gonna waste grails on Medusa?" This peeved me off because why in the world would it be a waste? Obviously people that like that character will give her grails or is that too much of a shock for you? Should peeps just be boring and grail for gameplay? Please. Astolfo is an OK AoE rider, interesting utility but he's held back by unpredictability, a complete shit of a first skill, and long as hell CDs. Its just plain wrong to say he's a hell of a lot better than Medusa.