Thread:Hitsuji Mamoru/@comment-27971189-20180124150902/@comment-27971189-20180804073432

Dantes is weaker than Lobo. I do have Lobo and he easily outclass Dantes on exactly same team where Dantes supposed to shine.

Lobo, under team capable of sustained critical, went straight to best 4* Avenger. 5 turn for 1 turn star-absorb to do sure crits whether its Quick Brave, or NP-A-A. 2 turns attack seems minor but  solid enough to decide the timing for someone with passive NP Gain, have 5 turn CD for damage mitigation and buff removal.

The fact they have low star-absorb benefit them in way similar to J. Alter. DPS that took stars only when they need it. They are glass cannon, but once stars start to roll the damage will make up for it; saying they're just another MHXA is-- sad.

Dantes OTOH, provide greater utilities and higher base attack they didn't have, but the utility not paid well nowadays as his normals didn't help much aside of damage until you score Quick Brave with Chateau D'If which would took long enough without sure crits under Golden Rule duration.

Skadi solve that issue, but even with that you will still prefer to see Dantes NP 2+ to know he can actually score something as an all-rounder.