Talk:King Hassan/@comment-28349180-20170112235903/@comment-29893250-20170120172418

Someone posts a quick analysis of a servant with reasonable comparison. Unregistered person claims them as "salty" for no reaon whatsoever (I detect no salt in the analysis for multiple reasons) and improperly uses the term of getting good (which implies skill) over a matter that is a combination of desire to roll, luck, and the wallet (which is all incompatible with gaming skill). Upon finding out that said person did have KH, unregistered person continues to ignore actual discussion of the analysis and proceeds to make claims of double yolo rolls and benching. Given that we all have an idea of the usual statistical chances of either of these being true behind the anonymity of the internet, let us take a moment to pity the fool and move on.

I was rather turned off at King Hassan from the point that I looked at his sheet. Obviously there are ways to make him work but you either have those enablers or you don't. Aside being made to do high fives with Merlin and the like, he seems a bit unwieldy to use. For those who have the shell, cool. For those who don't, I think he'd get in the way of their usual team synergy unless their team is just trying to cram as many buster chains as possible. But that doesn't really take advantage of the benefits of assassin class.

On this note, I found his card distribution a little weird. Visually, Azrael looks more like an arts NP (art of death) or a quick for a swift death. There's no hint of the usual destructive or explosive typical traits of a buster. So what makes him a QABBB lorewise?