Talk:Christmas 2017 Event/@comment-219.92.249.61-20171219162302/@comment-31734709-20171220074545

Why? Well I'll put it simply.

I like gambling.

Don't get me wrong, I like getting things.

But above that, I enjoy the gambling itself. That's as simple as it goes. This game's way of obtaining things is through gambling. I've told you before - if you can't enjoy the gamble itself, you'll be losing some enjoyment; but I suppose more than that, if you can't accept your losses without feeling down, then this type of game is not for you. I can spend 600 quartz and be happy because I've tossed that quartz, not because I got anything. I am rolling to get a character, but if I don't, that's just that. It's what happens in many gachas.

Is it going to be better for players if they can get what they want? Maybe. On a personal standpoint, I can sincerely say that I don't care if they allowed that or not.

As for your point of "we are from the outside and have no root access". Yes, we don't. I'm not ever cfully tossing that possibility away, however, as I see, it's much like not tossing one's chance to win at the lottery. I know there's the possibility, I just don't believe in it.

I said before, You'd have to find such a perfect equilibrium, that nobody actually notices it yet there's a point for it - which no human can even calculate such a variable. You can say that "the end result is that people spend and spend and get nothing" - but you have no data on your part to make a convincing argument.

You say the end result, but whose end result? What does it amount to? The fact that you said "it feels like I’m being blocked from getting what I want here" feels much like you are stressed by not getting the character you wanted and are just pulling this theory for an excuse for that - it feels personal, not an analysis based off anything. You may have seen many comments saying "I didn't get her after spending X", however I find it unlikely that you went actually on a research in order to find a pattern.

To sound convincing, you'd have to take data. It sounds absurd, but that's how it goes - because otherwise, you have absolutely nothing to sound slightly convincing.