Talk:Arjuna/@comment-2001:E68:5447:528C:61F7:BBDC:103D:C1D0-20180215112247/@comment-34041338-20180222130230

"His obidience and wholehearted devotion to Gods is highlighted as good traits in the literature however I believe it does not appeal to modern people." and this is what I meant when from a modern view Arjuna would be considered the bad guy and Karna the good guy, and probably why Nasu took the approach to the character's he did. He tweaked the personalities and actions to have Karna be more of a good guy and Arjuna to be someone along for the ride because of modern reader's aptitude. But in the context of the actual scriptures/legends it's reversed because of the morality of Hinduism and it's relationship with the political caste system being "correct" in that context and something Arjuna reinforces. I also corrected myself on whether it was Indra or Krishna, I got confused because Indra took away the armor while Krishna justified the morality of the situation to Arjuna.