Talk:Atalanta/@comment-75.73.101.70-20170812180841/@comment-28209103-20170823042822

In Nasuverse the alignment are determined purely by their mindset, regardless of their action, goal or belief. If there's no such thing as "too far" for you then you're evil however you don't exactly need to take action for it. I'm guessing it's the differences between western standard and eastern standard where Evil are broadly defined by act that harm surrounding (tho it depends on which part we're talking about, in Buddhism Good and Evil doesn't even exist.) but  doesn't have a clear form.

Basically it's not western standard with all of it's EZ labelling. In Nasuverse there's no absolute God and the only thing relatively resemble a God only act when they feel their "body" will be threatened. It's a world where Mankind are both "Good" and "Evil". It's a world where there's no set absolute rule to measure stuff, so how do you define good and Evil without any real standard? The standard of man cannot be applied to God and Demi God and so on and so forth.

Rather than how they see themselves it's closer to the rule and principle they set themselves, when one have absolutely no rule or principle that govern their action then it's Chaotic, when one doesn't really abide to any rule but neither against it then it's Neutral, when one set his own rule and saw through it till the end then he's Lawful.

When one doesn't have any qualms of harming (in really broad sense ofc) others they're evil, those whose existence can only bring harm are called Evil too regardless of it's intention. when one are neutral about harming other; they're fine with harming them if it's ofc Neutral, and one are reluctant to harm others or even move their way to shield other from harm then it's Good.